Conner v. State

187 S.E. 863, 183 Ga. 238
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1936·No. No. 11453·Published

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

1. Under the evidence in this case the jury were authorized to find that in the execution of a common purpose and design the accused was present when the decedent was shot and killed, and that the killing was the result of a conspiracy between the accused and a third party. The homicide was without justification or mitigation, and the jury did not err, under the evidence in the case, in returning a verdict of guilty.

2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conner v. State, 187 S.E. 863, 183 Ga. 238 (Ga. 1936).

187 S.E. 863 (Conner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.