Conner v. State
This text of 97 So. 3d 976 (Conner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the summary denial of Conner’s motion to withdraw plea because his claims are conclusively refuted by the record. See Henry v. State, 920 So.2d 1245, 1246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“Defendants are bound by the statements made by them under oath; they are not entitled to have them plea set aside by later claiming the plea was involuntary based on their allegedly perjured testimony.”); Iacono v. State, 930 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (defendant’s claims that he was under influence of psychotropic medication at time of plea, thereby rendering plea involuntary, conclusively refuted by plea colloquy).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 So. 3d 976, 2012 WL 4208716, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.