Conner v. Quora, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 JERI CONNOR, Case No. 18-cv-07597-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE 9 v. FROM DEFENDANT TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM 10 |) ~QUORA, INC., NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 Defendant. q 12

13 Plaintiff has filed a motion for relief from Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins’s Order 14 resolving this case’s latest discovery dispute. See Mot., ECF 209. Under this district’s Civil Local 2 15 Rules, the Court may deny a motion for relief from a nondispositive pretrial order of a magistrate 16 5 judge “by written order at any time, but may not grant it without first giving the opposing party an 17 opportunity to respond.” Civ. L.R. 72-2. Accordingly, the Court REQUESTS Defendant Quora, Z 18 Inc. file its response to Plaintiffs motion on or before January 8, 2021. 19 The Court requests that Quora address Plaintiff's citation to United States v. Sierra Pac. 20 Indus., No. CIV S—09—2445 KJM EFB, 2011 WL 2119078 (E.D. Cal. May 26, 2011) as well as 21 the other issues raised by Plaintiff in the motion. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: December 23, 2020 26 kom Loy heamer) 27 BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge