Conner v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Conner v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.

308 F. App'x 669

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 2009

DocketNo. 08-2024

StatusPublished

This text of 308 F. App'x 669 (Conner v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conner v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., 308 F. App'x 669 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donna Marie Conner appeals the district court’s order denying her Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Conner’s motion to appoint counsel and transfer case, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conner v. Lions Gate Entm’t Corp., No. 4:04-cv-00117-HCM-JEB (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donna Marie Conner appeals the district court’s order denying her Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Conner’s motion to appoint counsel and transfer case, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conner v. Lions Gate Entm’t Corp., No. 4:04-cv-00117-HCM-JEB (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 F. App'x 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-lions-gate-entertainment-corp-ca4-2009.