Conner v. Lewis
25 N.E. 349, 125 Ind. 599, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 499
This text of 25 N.E. 349 (Conner v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conner v. Lewis, 25 N.E. 349, 125 Ind. 599, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 499 (Ind. 1890).
Opinion
— Two questions only are argued by the appellant’s counsel, and these are that the verdict is contrary to law and that it is contrary to the evidence, but as there is no evidence in the record the argument is, of course, without the slightest force.
Judgment affirmed.
Berkshire, C. J., took no part in the decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 N.E. 349, 125 Ind. 599, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-lewis-ind-1890.