Conner v. King County Corrections Guild
This text of 36 F. App'x 629 (Conner v. King County Corrections Guild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jared Karstetter appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to RCW 4.84.185. After carefully reviewing the parties’ papers and the record, we affirm for the reasons set forth by Judge Lasnik in his order dated May 4, 2001.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-king-county-corrections-guild-ca9-2002.