Conner v. Commissioners of Rice County

20 Kan. 575
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Error is alleged in sustaining an order of attachment. The question is one of fact, and the testimony wholly by affidavit. It is enough to say upon this question of fact, that we think the court erred, and that there was not evidence sufficient to sustain the attachment.

The judgment will be reversed, and the case remanded with instructions to vacate and dissolve the attachment.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conner v. Commissioners of Rice County, 20 Kan. 575 (kan 1878).

20 Kan. 575 (Conner v. Commissioners of Rice County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tootle v. Brown
46 P. 550 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1896)
Carnahan v. Gustine
37 P. 594 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1894)
Hegwer v. Kiff & Co.
31 Kan. 440 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1884)