Conner v. Battery Park City Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conner v. Battery Park City Authority

35 A.D.3d 644, 824 N.Y.S.2d 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.D.3d 644 (Conner v. Battery Park City Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conner v. Battery Park City Authority, 35 A.D.3d 644, 824 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party defendant, Otis Elevator Company, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), [645]*645dated July 19, 2005, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the third-party complaint, and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiffs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see CPLR 3212). Prudenti, RJ., Krausman, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party defendant, Otis Elevator Company, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), [645]*645dated July 19, 2005, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the third-party complaint, and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiffs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see CPLR 3212). Prudenti, RJ., Krausman, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A.D.3d 644, 824 N.Y.S.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-battery-park-city-authority-nyappdiv-2006.