Conner, Christian Dior
This text of Conner, Christian Dior (Conner, Christian Dior) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-62,459-05 AND WR-62,459-06
EX PARTE CHRISTIAN DIOR CONNER, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W17-56395-M(A) AND W17-56396-M(A) IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pled guilty to evading arrest
and aggravated robbery, and he was sentenced to incarceration.
Applicant raises several claims in his habeas applications, including claims of involuntary
pleas, ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, and prosecutorial misconduct. He has
alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984);
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.
1999); Ex parte Morrow, 952 S.W.2d 530 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). There is no response from either -2-
counsel in the records provided to this Court, and there are no findings from the trial court. In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall order trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of
ineffective assistance by explaining counsel’s representation of Applicant, either at trial or on appeal,
including applicable strategy and tactical decisions. To obtain the responses, the trial court may use
any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing.
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised
in the habeas applications. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions
of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus
relief.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be
obtained from this Court.
Filed: August 21, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Conner, Christian Dior, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-christian-dior-texcrimapp-2019.