Connelly v. Wintermantel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Connelly v. Wintermantel

211 So. 2d 49, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1968

DocketNo. 67-762

StatusPublished

This text of 211 So. 2d 49 (Connelly v. Wintermantel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connelly v. Wintermantel, 211 So. 2d 49, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal attempts to set aside a judicial sale as the result of a foreclosure judgment.

It is not contended there was any irregularity in the sale; only that it is possible that a re-sale will result in a higher price. We find this to be an inadequate ground for ordering a re-sale. Ruff v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co., 99 Fla. 197, 126 So. 383; Certain Lands, etc. v. City of Coronado Beach, 128 Fla. 884, 175 So. 774; Northern Investment Corporation v. Coppock, 134 Fla. 168, 183 So. 635.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal attempts to set aside a judicial sale as the result of a foreclosure judgment.

It is not contended there was any irregularity in the sale; only that it is possible that a re-sale will result in a higher price. We find this to be an inadequate ground for ordering a re-sale. Ruff v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co., 99 Fla. 197, 126 So. 383; Certain Lands, etc. v. City of Coronado Beach, 128 Fla. 884, 175 So. 774; Northern Investment Corporation v. Coppock, 134 Fla. 168, 183 So. 635.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 So. 2d 49, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connelly-v-wintermantel-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack