Connelly v. Wintermantel
211 So. 2d 49, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416
Opinion
This appeal attempts to set aside a judicial sale as the result of a foreclosure judgment.
It is not contended there was any irregularity in the sale; only that it is possible that a re-sale will result in a higher price. We find this to be an inadequate ground for ordering a re-sale. Ruff v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co., 99 Fla. 197, 126 So. 383; Certain Lands, etc. v. City of Coronado Beach, 128 Fla. 884, 175 So. 774; Northern Investment Corporation v. Coppock, 134 Fla. 168, 183 So. 635.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connelly v. Wintermantel, 211 So. 2d 49, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
211 So. 2d 49 (Connelly v. Wintermantel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruff v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co.
126 So. 383 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Certain Lands, Etc. v. City of Coronado Beach
175 So. 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Northern Investment Corp. v. Coppock
183 So. 635 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)