Connelly v. Williams

Texas Supreme Court

Connelly v. Williams

22 Tex. 645

DecidedJuly 1, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Tex. 645 (Connelly v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connelly v. Williams, 22 Tex. 645 (Tex. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

It was competent for the court, upon a withdrawal of the answer hy the defendants, to render judgment, the demand being liquidated, without the aid of a jury.

This rule is well settled hy the cases of Cartwright v. Roff, 1 Tex. Rep. 78; Burton v. Lawrence, 4 Id. 373, and Wheeler v. Pope, 5 Id. 262. Upon the authority of those cases, the judgment of the court below is affirmed, with damages.

Affirmed with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

It was competent for the court, upon a withdrawal of the answer hy the defendants, to render judgment, the demand being liquidated, without the aid of a jury.

This rule is well settled hy the cases of Cartwright v. Roff, 1 Tex. Rep. 78; Burton v. Lawrence, 4 Id. 373, and Wheeler v. Pope, 5 Id. 262. Upon the authority of those cases, the judgment of the court below is affirmed, with damages.

Affirmed with damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Tex. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connelly-v-williams-tex-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack