Connelly v. Weisfeld

59 A.2d 869, 142 N.J. Eq. 406, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 661
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 13, 1948·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Woodruff.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodihe, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burlihg, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLeah, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connelly v. Weisfeld, 59 A.2d 869, 142 N.J. Eq. 406, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 661 (N.J. 1948).

59 A.2d 869 (Connelly v. Weisfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of the Estate of Elise Morenon
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Alan Chorun v. Philip Chorun
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Paragon Securities Company v. Cohen
589 F.2d 1240 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Giannone v. Cohen
589 F.2d 1240 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Gerard v. Distefano
202 A.2d 220 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
Armel v. Crewick
176 A.2d 532 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
In Re Opper
103 A.2d 19 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)