Connelly v. State
This text of 1951 OK CR 129 (Connelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, E. C. Connelly, was charged by an information filed in the county court of Kiowa county of the offense of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; was tried to a jury who returned a verdict of guilty and fixed the punishment at a fine of one dollar. In accordance with the jury’s verdict the defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of one dollar, and has appealed.
No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant and no appearance has been made in his behalf.
We have read all of the record. There is a decided conflict in the evidence. Six witnesses testified for each side. The state’s witnesses said defendant was driving a truck on a public highway near the town of Lone Wolf and that he was in a drunken condition. The defendant’s witnesses, who claimed they saw defendant at about the same time as the state’s witnesses, all testified that he was sober. The defendant testified that he had never been arrested before in his life.
[371]*371It is not the province of this court to overthrow the verdict of the jury where the evidence is conflicting and there is competent evidence in the record from which the jury could fairly find that defendant was guilty as charged.
Judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1951 OK CR 129, 236 P.2d 278, 94 Okla. Crim. 370, 1951 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connelly-v-state-oklacrimapp-1951.