Connelly v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Connelly v. State

147 So. 919, 226 Ala. 697

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 6, 1933

Docket6 Div. 708.

StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 919 (Connelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connelly v. State, 147 So. 919, 226 Ala. 697 (Ala. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

The appellant was indicted and, tried in the circuit court of Jefferson county for the offense of murder in the first degree. The trial resulted in the conviction of appellant of murder in the first degree, and his punishment was fixed by the jury at life imprisonment in the penitentiary. Prom the verdict and sentence, defendant prosecutes this appeal upon -the record, without a bill of exceptions.

The record proper discloses due and proper organization of the court at which the indictment was found and returned against the defendant, and the record also affirmatively shows that the indictment, trial, conviction, and sentence of the defendant are, in all respects, regular.

Inasmuch as no error appears upon the record, and there being no bill of exceptions, the judgment and sentence of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN) JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KNIGHT, Justice.

The appellant was indicted and, tried in the circuit court of Jefferson county for the offense of murder in the first degree. The trial resulted in the conviction of appellant of murder in the first degree, and his punishment was fixed by the jury at life imprisonment in the penitentiary. Prom the verdict and sentence, defendant prosecutes this appeal upon -the record, without a bill of exceptions.

The record proper discloses due and proper organization of the court at which the indictment was found and returned against the defendant, and the record also affirmatively shows that the indictment, trial, conviction, and sentence of the defendant are, in all respects, regular.

Inasmuch as no error appears upon the record, and there being no bill of exceptions, the judgment and sentence of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN) JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 So. 919, 226 Ala. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connelly-v-state-ala-1933.