Connelly v. . Morse Dry Dock and Repair Company
139 N.E. 752, 235 N.Y. 602, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1326
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Danielsen v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. (235 N. Y. 439.)
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connelly v. . Morse Dry Dock and Repair Company, 139 N.E. 752, 235 N.Y. 602, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1326 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 752 (Connelly v. . Morse Dry Dock and Repair Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.
264 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1924)