Connelly v. Michigan Central Railroad

207 Ill. App. 25
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 11, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,895·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Commerce, § 4* — when railroad is engaged in interstate commerce. A railroad company engaged in hauling freight from a point in one State to a point in another State is engaged in interstate commerce. 3. Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 4* — where remedy of employee is not under. Under section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (J. & A. 5450), the remedy of an employee injured while engaged in interstate commerce, and while in the employ of a carrier by land engaged in interstate commerce, is under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and not under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1911.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connelly v. Michigan Central Railroad, 207 Ill. App. 25 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

207 Ill. App. 25 (Connelly v. Michigan Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.