Connelly v. Michigan Central Railroad

207 Ill. App. 25
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 11, 1917
DocketGen. No. 22,895
StatusPublished

This text of 207 Ill. App. 25 (Connelly v. Michigan Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connelly v. Michigan Central Railroad, 207 Ill. App. 25 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Commerce, § 4* — when railroad is engaged in interstate commerce. A railroad company engaged in hauling freight from a point in one State to a point in another State is engaged in interstate commerce. 3. Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 4* — where remedy of employee is not under. Under section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (J. & A. 5450), the remedy of an employee injured while engaged in interstate commerce, and while in the employ of a carrier by land engaged in interstate commerce, is under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and not under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1911.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 Ill. App. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connelly-v-michigan-central-railroad-illappct-1917.