Connellsville & Southern Pennsylvania Railroad v. Baltimore

Supreme Court

Connellsville & Southern Pennsylvania Railroad v. Baltimore

154 U.S. 553, 38 L. Ed. 1087, 14 S. Ct. 1199, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 637

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 29, 1867

DocketNo. 413

StatusPublished

This text of 154 U.S. 553 (Connellsville & Southern Pennsylvania Railroad v. Baltimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connellsville & Southern Pennsylvania Railroad v. Baltimore, 154 U.S. 553, 38 L. Ed. 1087, 14 S. Ct. 1199, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 637 (1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Chase

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have considered the motion to dismiss the appeal of the Pittsburgh and Connellsville Railroad Company, and, are of opinion that that company was a proper party defendant in the court below and the appeal in the record appears to have been taken by this defendant as well as by the others. We must therefore overrule the motion to dismiss.

We have also further considered the motion to rescind the order heretofore made assigning the matter for hearing at this term, and have come to the conclusion that the order should be rescinded. And it is So directed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Chase

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have considered the motion to dismiss the appeal of the Pittsburgh and Connellsville Railroad Company, and, are of opinion that that company was a proper party defendant in the court below and the appeal in the record appears to have been taken by this defendant as well as by the others. We must therefore overrule the motion to dismiss.

We have also further considered the motion to rescind the order heretofore made assigning the matter for hearing at this term, and have come to the conclusion that the order should be rescinded. And it is So directed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 U.S. 553, 38 L. Ed. 1087, 14 S. Ct. 1199, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connellsville-southern-pennsylvania-railroad-v-baltimore-scotus-1867.