Connell v. Webb

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Connell v. Webb

34 A. 346, 175 Pa. 52, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1206

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 6, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 42·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are not convinced that the learned court erred in hold[56]*56ing tbe averments contained in the affidavit of defense were sufficient to carry the case to a jury.

Inasmuch as the case goes back for trial by jury, it is neither necessary nor desirable at this time to express any opinion as to the merits of the questions intended to be raised by the averments referred to.

Appeal dismissed at plaintiff’s costs, without prejudice, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are not convinced that the learned court erred in hold[56]*56ing tbe averments contained in the affidavit of defense were sufficient to carry the case to a jury.

Inasmuch as the case goes back for trial by jury, it is neither necessary nor desirable at this time to express any opinion as to the merits of the questions intended to be raised by the averments referred to.

Appeal dismissed at plaintiff’s costs, without prejudice, etc.

Connell v. Webb, 34 A. 346, 175 Pa. 52, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1206 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

34 A. 346 (Connell v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related