Connell v. Waddell

106 S.E. 20, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 118
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1921·No. 11655·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Where proof of service of a bill of exceptions is to the effect that a copy thereof was left at the residence of the attorney for the defendant in error during the attorney’s absence from the county, it must also affirmatively appear that the defendant in error (unless the defendant in error is the State) is a nonresident of the county where the bill of exceptions was sued out. Civil Code (1910), § 6160, subdiv. 2; Bank of S. W. Ga. v. Tillman, 94 Ga. 731 (20 S. E. 4). Such fact of nonresidence not being made to appear in the instant case, the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions must necessarily be granted.

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens and Bill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connell v. Waddell, 106 S.E. 20, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

106 S.E. 20 (Connell v. Waddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bacon Grocery Co. v. Johnson
131 S.E.2d 140 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Sanders v. Sanders
137 S.E. 15 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)