Connell v. United States
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
March 22, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-2085
GERALD CONNELL,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Arthur W. Tifford on brief for appellant. _________________
Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Craig N. Moore, __________________ _______________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. Defendant-appellant Gerald Connell ___________
appeals the summary dismissal of his motion pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 2255 on the sole ground that his guilty plea is
invalid. We affirm for the reasons contained in section II C ______
(1)(c) of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation
dated May 31, 1995. See Loc. R. 27.1. ___
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connell v. United States, (1st Cir. 1996).
Connell v. United States (Connell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.