Connell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Connell v. State

229 S.W. 502, 89 Tex. Crim. 111, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 373

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 30, 1921

DocketNo. 6186.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 229 S.W. 502 (Connell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connell v. State, 229 S.W. 502, 89 Tex. Crim. 111, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 373 (Tex. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled. Neither motion for new trial, statement of facts, nor bills of exception is necessary to give jurisdiction of the appeal. Sessions v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 425, and authorities therein cited.

We discern no defects in the indictment. In the absence of the statement of facts we assume that the judgment is based upon sufficient evidence, and in the absence of bills of exception, that the court correctly ruled upon questions of practice.

The judgment is affirmed. •

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI