Connell v. State Tax Commission

267 A.D. 923, 46 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5535
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Relator, a general agent, for the city of New York, Long Island and Westchester County, of the Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, asserts that an unincorporated business tax (Tax Law, art. 16-A) should not be assessed against him. Substantially the same question was determined in People ex rel. Luther v. State Tax Commission (265 App. Div. 976, affd. 291 N. Y. 691) adversely to relator’s contention.' In the Luther case exemption was claimed upon the ground that the relators were fiduciaries. Here the defense is that Connell is an employee of the insurance company. Determination confirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenek, JJ., . ..ncur. [See post, p. 1006.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connell v. State Tax Commission, 267 A.D. 923, 46 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 923 (Connell v. State Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Feinberg v. Chapman
274 A.D. 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)