Connell v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Connell v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 554, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 133

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided May 14, 1931·No. No. 1674·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimant was employed by the State as a structural iron worker on the Brandon Road Lock and Dam, being project No. 5 of the Illinois Waterway. On December 10, 1929, while engaged at his duties, he received an injury to his right foot. The injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. We have carefully considered the evidence in the case and find he is entitled to be compensated for his injury in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. He is accordingly awarded the sum of $442.50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimant was employed by the State as a structural iron worker on the Brandon Road Lock and Dam, being project No. 5 of the Illinois Waterway. On December 10, 1929, while engaged at his duties, he received an injury to his right foot. The injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. We have carefully considered the evidence in the case and find he is entitled to be compensated for his injury in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. He is accordingly awarded the sum of $442.50.

Connell v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 554, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 554 (Connell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.