Connell v. State

72 S.E. 304, 9 Ga. App. 818, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 345
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 10, 1911
Docket3504
StatusPublished

This text of 72 S.E. 304 (Connell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connell v. State, 72 S.E. 304, 9 Ga. App. 818, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 345 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. In a prosecution against a man for fornication or adultery, testimony that the female with whom the intercourse is alleged to have taken place had intercourse with another man is immaterial, even though the female herself is a witness for the State.

2. A female witness can not be impeached by proof of specific acts of illicit intercourse. ' Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 304, 9 Ga. App. 818, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-state-gactapp-1911.