Connell v. Parrish

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Connell v. Parrish

13 S.E.2d 46, 64 Ga. App. 300, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 26

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 1941

Docket28589.

StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.E.2d 46 (Connell v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connell v. Parrish, 13 S.E.2d 46, 64 Ga. App. 300, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to sustain the finding of the ordinary that the way in question had been established by prescription, as alleged, in the essentials provided by law. The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Maolntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to sustain the finding of the ordinary that the way in question had been established by prescription, as alleged, in the essentials provided by law. The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Maolntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.E.2d 46, 64 Ga. App. 300, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-parrish-gactapp-1941.