Connell v. Nasuti

Third Circuit

Connell v. Nasuti

937 F.2d 596, 1991 WL 119006

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1991

Docket91-1053

StatusPublished

This text of 937 F.2d 596 (Connell v. Nasuti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connell v. Nasuti, 937 F.2d 596, 1991 WL 119006 (3d Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

937 F.2d 596

Connell (Robert A.), Smith (Allen), Emge (Benjamin), Newtown
Enterprise Associates, Inc., Shearson Lehman
Hutton, Inc., Smith (Craig A.)
v.
Nasuti (Celeste), Novak (Gail), Kentucky Fried Chicken
Corporation, Burger King Corp., Frey (L. Oliver), Summerwood
Construction Corp., Woodsnam (Richard E.), Keen (Gordon L.,
Jr.), McCausland (Peter), Brick Hotel Associates (2 Cases)

NO. 91-1053

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUN 20, 1991

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Fullam, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI