Connell v. Murray

423 S.E.2d 304, 205 Ga. App. 702, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2299, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1302
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 5, 1992
DocketA92A1077
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 423 S.E.2d 304 (Connell v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connell v. Murray, 423 S.E.2d 304, 205 Ga. App. 702, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2299, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Johnson, Judge.

Lenny Connell died testate on September 18, 1990. Melvin Murray was appointed temporary administrator of Connell’s estate on March 1, 1991. On that same date, Murray filed a personal injury lawsuit against himself as temporary administrator of the estate. Thereafter, Mary Connell, the decedent’s mother, qualified as executor of [703]*703the estate and the temporary letters of administration issued to Murray were revoked. Attorneys for the estate filed a motion to dismiss Murray’s complaint on the ground that Murray could not be both plaintiff and defendant in the same action. Murray then filed a motion to substitute Mary Connell as the defendant in his action. The trial court entered an order denying the motion to dismiss and granting Murray’s motion to substitute. Mary Connell appeals from that order.

Decided October 5, 1992. Simpson & Gray, Ralph F. Simpson, Elizabeth B. Gibbs, for appellant. Moore & Studstill, Mitchell 0. Moore, William S. Perry, O’Neal, Brown & Sizemore, Manley F. Brown, for appellee.

A person cannot sue himself; the same person cannot be both plaintiff and defendant in the same action, even in different capacities. Perdue v. McKenzie, 194 Ga. 356, 364 (2) (21 SE2d 705) (1942); Langford v. Johnson, 46 Ga. App. 444 (3) (167 SE 779) (1933). Murray’s action against himself was therefore void from its inception and the trial court erred in not dismissing it. Because the action was void from its beginning, the trial court had no authority to substitute Mary Connell as the defendant. Accordingly, the trial court also erred in granting Murray’s motion to substitute.

Judgment reversed.

Carley, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SWAIN v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.
2024 OK CIV APP 15 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2023)
In Re Estate of William C. Link
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 S.E.2d 304, 205 Ga. App. 702, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2299, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-murray-gactapp-1992.