Connell v. Figman
This text of 34 A.D.2d 777 (Connell v. Figman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered December 24, 1969 unanimously modified on the law to the extent of directing summary judgment for plaintiff for the sum $1,200.38 without interest and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In this accounting action defendant concedes a balance due plaintiff of $1,200.38 and has tendered that sum. Judgment to that extent should have been rendered. The disputed item as to the propriety of hiring an attorney, the services rendered and the value thereof should be determined by the court or a Special Referee. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McNally, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A.D.2d 777, 311 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-figman-nyappdiv-1970.