Connell v. Ellison
This text of 447 N.E.2d 76 (Connell v. Ellison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 943). This disposition is without prejudice to either party, if so *872 advised, making application to the trial court to obtain a definition of boundaries of the subject premises.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 N.E.2d 76, 58 N.Y.2d 869, 460 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-ellison-ny-1983.