Connell v. Culpepper & Boon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Connell v. Culpepper & Boon

30 Ga. 107

DecidedMarch 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Ga. 107 (Connell v. Culpepper & Boon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connell v. Culpepper & Boon, 30 Ga. 107 (Ga. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

Had the jury found for Connell in this case, we should have felt constrained to have awarded a new trial. A clearer case of combination and confederacy than that established by the proof, between Connell and the Rodahans — Charles and John, we have seldom seen.

The proceedings under the Driver executions, alone, if there was nothing else, would constitute an effectual bar to [112]*112prevent G. T1 Connell from subjecting the property bought by Culpepper and Boon, to the payment of hisji. fa. We cheerfully and cordially affirm the judgment of the Circuit Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

Had the jury found for Connell in this case, we should have felt constrained to have awarded a new trial. A clearer case of combination and confederacy than that established by the proof, between Connell and the Rodahans — Charles and John, we have seldom seen.

The proceedings under the Driver executions, alone, if there was nothing else, would constitute an effectual bar to [112]*112prevent G. T1 Connell from subjecting the property bought by Culpepper and Boon, to the payment of hisji. fa. We cheerfully and cordially affirm the judgment of the Circuit Judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Ga. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-v-culpepper-boon-ga-1860.