Connell ex rel. Ellison & Sons v. Shryock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Connell ex rel. Ellison & Sons v. Shryock

31 A. 731, 167 Pa. 483, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 934

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 22, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 219

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 31 A. 731 (Connell ex rel. Ellison & Sons v. Shryock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connell ex rel. Ellison & Sons v. Shryock, 31 A. 731, 167 Pa. 483, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 934 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in the contract on which this suit is based that could by any possibility entitle the legal plaintiff to maintain an action against the defendant for the residue of purchase money, under said contract, after the former had sold and con[487]*487veyed the same property to another person who paid him the full consideration for said conveyance. The learned 'judge' of the common pleas was therefore right in refusing plaintiff’s points for charge, and in directing a verdict for defendant. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in the contract on which this suit is based that could by any possibility entitle the legal plaintiff to maintain an action against the defendant for the residue of purchase money, under said contract, after the former had sold and con[487]*487veyed the same property to another person who paid him the full consideration for said conveyance. The learned 'judge' of the common pleas was therefore right in refusing plaintiff’s points for charge, and in directing a verdict for defendant. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 731, 167 Pa. 483, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connell-ex-rel-ellison-sons-v-shryock-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack