Connecticut Water v. Town of Thomaston, No. Cv94 0535590 (Nov. 25, 1996)
Opinion
As to paragraph 3 the reference to CWC was incorrect and SCASCO was the intended reference.
As to paragraph 2, I think a request to revise would be or could have been appropriate because at this juncture paragraphs 13a, b and d really do not set forth different causes of action. In that sense the situation is not like that in Oink Inc. v. AnnSt. Limited,
CORRADINO, J. CT Page 9238
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9237 (Connecticut Water v. Town of Thomaston, No. Cv94 0535590 (Nov. 25, 1996)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.