Connecticut v. Stuart
980 A.2d 914, 293 Conn. 922
This text of 980 A.2d 914 (Connecticut v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Connecticut v. Stuart, 980 A.2d 914, 293 Conn. 922 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
State of CONNECTICUT
v.
Mark T. STUART.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Wayne A. Francis, Hartford, in support of the petition.
James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn.App. 541, 967 A.2d 532 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Stuart
967 A.2d 532 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
980 A.2d 914, 293 Conn. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-v-stuart-conn-2009.