Connecticut v. Campbell
980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 440 (AC 29794), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly relied on State v. Sealy, 208 Conn. 689, 546 A.2d 271 (1988), to conclude that one’s residence or place of abode cannot include common corridors and areas used to access a bathroom, kitchen and other areas necessary to life?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connecticut v. Campbell, 980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 2009).
980 A.2d 913 (Connecticut v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Campbell
13 A.3d 661 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)