Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Connecticut v. Campbell

Connecticut v. Campbell

980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 23, 2009
DocketSC 18453
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 980 A.2d 913 (Connecticut v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connecticut v. Campbell, 980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 2009).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 440 (AC 29794), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*927 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18453. Lisa J. Steele, special public defender, in support of the petition. Adam E. Mattei, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 23, 2009
“Whether the Appellate Court properly relied on State v. Sealy, 208 Conn. 689, 546 A.2d 271 (1988), to conclude that one’s residence or place of abode cannot include common corridors and areas used to access a bathroom, kitchen and other areas necessary to life?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Campbell
13 A.3d 661 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-v-campbell-conn-2009.