Connecticut v. Campbell

980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 23, 2009·No. SC 18453·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 440 (AC 29794), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*927 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18453. Lisa J. Steele, special public defender, in support of the petition. Adam E. Mattei, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 23, 2009
“Whether the Appellate Court properly relied on State v. Sealy, 208 Conn. 689, 546 A.2d 271 (1988), to conclude that one’s residence or place of abode cannot include common corridors and areas used to access a bathroom, kitchen and other areas necessary to life?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connecticut v. Campbell, 980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 416 (Colo. 2009).

980 A.2d 913 (Connecticut v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Campbell
13 A.3d 661 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)