Connecticut Street Development Corp. v. Garber Building Supplies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Connecticut Street Development Corp. v. Garber Building Supplies, Inc.

216 A.D.2d 561, 628 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7005

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 561 (Connecticut Street Development Corp. v. Garber Building Supplies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connecticut Street Development Corp. v. Garber Building Supplies, Inc., 216 A.D.2d 561, 628 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to discharge a mechanic’s lien, Garber Building Supplies appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated December 20, 1993, which granted the petitioner’s motion to reargue an order of the same court, dated February 4, 1993, denying its motion to discharge the lien, and upon reargument, granted the motion discharging the lien.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court permissibly considered the petitioner’s claim in support of its motion for reargument that service of the notice of lien was defective (see, Matter of PKS Dev. Co. v Kahn Lbr. & Millwork Co., 187 AD2d 656). Further, because service was not properly effected pursuant to Lien Law § 11, the appellant’s lien was properly discharged (see, Matter of HMB Acquisition Corp. v F & K Supply, 209 AD2d 412; Matter of Podolosky v Narnoc Corp., 196 AD2d 593; Bank Leumi Trust Co. v Ryder Constr., 191 AD2d 224; PKS Dev. Co. v Kahn Lbr. & Millwork Co.,supra, at 656; 146 W. 45th St. Corp. v McNally, 188 AD2d 410; Matter of Hui’s Realty v Transcontinental Constr. Servs., 168 AD2d 302; Murphy Constr. Corp. v Morrissey, 168 AD2d 877).

In light of our determination, we need not reach any other arguments. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to discharge a mechanic’s lien, Garber Building Supplies appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated December 20, 1993, which granted the petitioner’s motion to reargue an order of the same court, dated February 4, 1993, denying its motion to discharge the lien, and upon reargument, granted the motion discharging the lien.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court permissibly considered the petitioner’s claim in support of its motion for reargument that service of the notice of lien was defective (see, Matter of PKS Dev. Co. v Kahn Lbr. & Millwork Co., 187 AD2d 656). Further, because service was not properly effected pursuant to Lien Law § 11, the appellant’s lien was properly discharged (see, Matter of HMB Acquisition Corp. v F & K Supply, 209 AD2d 412; Matter of Podolosky v Narnoc Corp., 196 AD2d 593; Bank Leumi Trust Co. v Ryder Constr., 191 AD2d 224; PKS Dev. Co. v Kahn Lbr. & Millwork Co.,supra, at 656; 146 W. 45th St. Corp. v McNally, 188 AD2d 410; Matter of Hui’s Realty v Transcontinental Constr. Servs., 168 AD2d 302; Murphy Constr. Corp. v Morrissey, 168 AD2d 877).

In light of our determination, we need not reach any other arguments. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 561, 628 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-street-development-corp-v-garber-building-supplies-inc-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack