Connecticut Post Ltd. v. Milford Sp., No. Cv N.H. 9412-6691 (Aug. 22, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Connecticut Post Ltd. v. Milford Sp., No. Cv N.H. 9412-6691 (Aug. 22, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 9862

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedAugust 22, 1995

DocketNo. CV N.H. 9412-6691

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 9862 (Connecticut Post Ltd. v. Milford Sp., No. Cv N.H. 9412-6691 (Aug. 22, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connecticut Post Ltd. v. Milford Sp., No. Cv N.H. 9412-6691 (Aug. 22, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 9862 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE' JUDGEMENT Having heard the evidence produced at the hearing in damages in this breach of contract action, and having considered the plaintiff's cogently presented post-hearing brief, the Court finds that the plaintiff has followed the confines of Rokalor, Inc. v. ConnecticutEating Enterprises, Inc., 18 Conn. App. 384, 388-89 (1989), in terminating its leasing contract with the defendant, as well as the mandate of Danpar Associates v.Somersville Mills Sales Room, 182 Conn. 444, 446 (1980), in mitigating its damages.

Accordingly, the Court awards to the plaintiff $301,943.10 as damages for lost rental income. In addition, the Court awards to the plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $721.20, as well as $105.80 in costs.

Clarance J. Jones, Judge CT Page 9863

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE' JUDGEMENT Having heard the evidence produced at the hearing in damages in this breach of contract action, and having considered the plaintiff's cogently presented post-hearing brief, the Court finds that the plaintiff has followed the confines of Rokalor, Inc. v. ConnecticutEating Enterprises, Inc., 18 Conn. App. 384, 388-89 (1989), in terminating its leasing contract with the defendant, as well as the mandate of Danpar Associates v.Somersville Mills Sales Room, 182 Conn. 444, 446 (1980), in mitigating its damages.

Accordingly, the Court awards to the plaintiff $301,943.10 as damages for lost rental income. In addition, the Court awards to the plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $721.20, as well as $105.80 in costs.

Clarance J. Jones, Judge CT Page 9863

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 9862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-post-ltd-v-milford-sp-no-cv-nh-9412-6691-aug-22-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack