Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Lanahan

Sixth Circuit

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Lanahan

113 F.2d 935, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3505

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1940

DocketNo. 8265

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 113 F.2d 935 (Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Lanahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Lanahan, 113 F.2d 935, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3505 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that upon review of the .judgment for the appellee in the above-entitled cause it was reversed with direction that the cause be remanded for a new trial in conformity with the opinion, and it further appearing that the cause was tried subsequent to the promulgation of Rule 50(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c,_ and thát a motion was pending below on behalf of the appellant for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Baltimore & Carolina Line Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636), now, therefore, it is ordered that the direction for mandate in the above cause, 112 F.2d 375, be and it is hereby amended so as to read: “The judgment below is reversed and the cause is remanded with direction to enter judgment for the defendant.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that upon review of the .judgment for the appellee in the above-entitled cause it was reversed with direction that the cause be remanded for a new trial in conformity with the opinion, and it further appearing that the cause was tried subsequent to the promulgation of Rule 50(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c,_ and thát a motion was pending below on behalf of the appellant for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Baltimore & Carolina Line Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636), now, therefore, it is ordered that the direction for mandate in the above cause, 112 F.2d 375, be and it is hereby amended so as to read: “The judgment below is reversed and the cause is remanded with direction to enter judgment for the defendant.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 F.2d 935, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-mutual-life-insurance-v-lanahan-ca6-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack