Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Chicago
53 N.E. 1134, 178 Ill. 505, 1899 Ill. LEXIS 2832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Chicago. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 Ill. 148 →
Opinion
The ordinance providing for the improvement and the special assessment complained of in this case is the same as the one held insufficient in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263. We see no sufficient reason for overruling that case, and it must control this.
The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Chicago, 53 N.E. 1134, 178 Ill. 505, 1899 Ill. LEXIS 2832 (Ill. 1899).
53 N.E. 1134 (Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holden v. City of Chicago
50 N.E. 181 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)