Connecticut Mutual Life Assurance Co. v. Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Railroad
This text of 23 How. Pr. 180 (Connecticut Mutual Life Assurance Co. v. Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
My associates concur with me in the opinion that, where parties making a contract out of the state contemplate its performance in the state, the cause of action arises here, and the court has jurisdiction. We have recently decided to hold so in the case where a suit is brought on a policy of an insolvent Life Insurance Company, where the parties entered into the contract out of the state, but contemplated performance here.
The attachment is entitled to be sustained, and an order must be made affirming the order appealed from.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 How. Pr. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-mutual-life-assurance-co-v-cleveland-columbus-cincinnati-nysupct-1862.