Connecticut Light and Power v. Randolph, No. Cv 00-0434831-S (Aug. 5, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Connecticut Light and Power v. Randolph, No. Cv 00-0434831-S (Aug. 5, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9946

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedAugust 5, 2002

DocketNo. CV 00-0434831-S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9946 (Connecticut Light and Power v. Randolph, No. Cv 00-0434831-S (Aug. 5, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Connecticut Light and Power v. Randolph, No. Cv 00-0434831-S (Aug. 5, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9946 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Plaintiff seeks to reargue the above-entitled case wherein the court entered judgment in favor of the defendant plus costs on May 22, 2002. The court had found that the plaintiff failed to prove its damages and the court is of the same opinion after reargument.

Nevertheless, the defendant concedes he was liable. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages in the amount of $100 plus costs; Grey v. Coastal States Holding Co., 22 Conn. App. 497,566 (1990); and the court's memorandum of decision of May 22, 2002 is amended to provide judgment in favor of the plaintiff with an award of nominal damages in the amount of $100 plus costs.

Robert I. Berdon, Judge Trial Referee CT Page 9947

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Plaintiff seeks to reargue the above-entitled case wherein the court entered judgment in favor of the defendant plus costs on May 22, 2002. The court had found that the plaintiff failed to prove its damages and the court is of the same opinion after reargument.

Nevertheless, the defendant concedes he was liable. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages in the amount of $100 plus costs; Grey v. Coastal States Holding Co., 22 Conn. App. 497,566 (1990); and the court's memorandum of decision of May 22, 2002 is amended to provide judgment in favor of the plaintiff with an award of nominal damages in the amount of $100 plus costs.

Robert I. Berdon, Judge Trial Referee CT Page 9947

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-light-and-power-v-randolph-no-cv-00-0434831-s-aug-5-2002-connsuperct-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack