CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown
This text of 44 A.3d 183 (CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION
v.
Joshua DROWN et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.
Thomas P. O'Connor, Greenwich, and Charles W. Pleterse, in opposition.
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 140, 37 A.3d 820, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that exclusion (i) of the Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange (MUX) policy unambiguously excluded coverage in this case?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association had immunity for the actions of MUX committed prior to MIIX's insolvency?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.3d 183, 305 Conn. 908, 2012 WL 2330261, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-insurance-guaranty-association-v-drown-conn-2012.