CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown

44 A.3d 183, 305 Conn. 908, 2012 WL 2330261, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 256
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 30, 2012·No. SC 18975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

44 A.3d 183 (2012)
305 Conn. 908

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION
v.
Joshua DROWN et al.

SC 18975

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 30, 2012.

Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.

Thomas P. O'Connor, Greenwich, and Charles W. Pleterse, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 140, 37 A.3d 820, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that exclusion (i) of the Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange (MUX) policy unambiguously excluded coverage in this case?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association had immunity for the actions of MUX committed prior to MIIX's insolvency?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown, 44 A.3d 183, 305 Conn. 908, 2012 WL 2330261, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 256 (Colo. 2012).

44 A.3d 183 (CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Connecticut Ins. Guaranty Assn. v. Drown
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014