Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

377 A.2d 1123, 173 Conn. 776
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 28, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of 377 A.2d 1123 (Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 377 A.2d 1123, 173 Conn. 776 (Colo. 1977).

Opinion

The motion by Joan E. Pilver and David C. Shaw for permission to appear, file a brief and argne before this court as amici curiae in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted to the extent that a brief may be filed.

The application by John Rose, Jr., to permit Norman R. Buchsbaum and Bert N. Bisgyer of the Maryland bar to appear pro hac vice, file a brief and argue before this court as amici curiae in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted to the extent that a brief may be filed provided it is cosigned by a member of the bar of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 A.2d 1123, 173 Conn. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/connecticut-institute-for-the-blind-v-connecticut-commission-on-human-conn-1977.