Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

377 A.2d 1123, 173 Conn. 776

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 28, 1977·Published

Opinion

The motion by Joan E. Pilver and David C. Shaw for permission to appear, file a brief and argne before this court as amici curiae in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted to the extent that a brief may be filed.

The application by John Rose, Jr., to permit Norman R. Buchsbaum and Bert N. Bisgyer of the Maryland bar to appear pro hac vice, file a brief and argue before this court as amici curiae in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted to the extent that a brief may be filed provided it is cosigned by a member of the bar of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion by Joan E. Pilver and David C. Shaw for permission to appear, file a brief and argne before this court as amici curiae in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted to the extent that a brief may be filed.

The application by John Rose, Jr., to permit Norman R. Buchsbaum and Bert N. Bisgyer of the Maryland bar to appear pro hac vice, file a brief and argue before this court as amici curiae in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted to the extent that a brief may be filed provided it is cosigned by a member of the bar of this state.

Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 377 A.2d 1123, 173 Conn. 776 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

377 A.2d 1123 (Connecticut Institute for the Blind v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.