Connecticut General Development Corp. v. Guson

477 So. 2d 665, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2442, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16520
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 1985·No. No. 85-608·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, having originally filed an answer which was stricken with leave to file an amended answer, were entitled to service of a copy of plaintiffs’ motion for default and notice of hearing on that motion.1 As appellants were not served with the motion for default nor given notice of the hearing thereon before entry of the order entering default, appellants were entitled to have the order entering default set aside and vacated. Therefore, the trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion to set aside the order entering a default.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connecticut General Development Corp. v. Guson, 477 So. 2d 665, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2442, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

477 So. 2d 665 (Connecticut General Development Corp. v. Guson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clearvalle, Inc. v. Cohen
561 So. 2d 1354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Motzer v. Tanner
561 So. 2d 1336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)