Conn v. Thornton

46 Ala. 587
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 Ala. 587 (Conn v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn v. Thornton, 46 Ala. 587 (Ala. 1871).

Opinion

B. F. SAFFOLD, ,J.

Of the essential elements of a promissory nóte, one is, certainly, as to the time of payment. Here, the rule that what can be made certain is ■certain, is permitted to operate. A note payable within a limited time after a man’s death, is sufficiently certain as to the time of payment, because an event must occur which will make this definite, — 1 Pars, on Notes and Bills, pp. 40, 88, 39. A written promise to pay a certain sum of money at the death of a party to the instrument, or at a limited time after the death of such a party, or of a third person, is a valid promissory note; because it must inevitably become due at some future time, since all men must die, although the exact period is uncertain. — Story on Prom. Notes, § 27.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorsey v. Hudmon
60 So. 303 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
Simon v. Pine Bluff Trust Co.
138 S.W. 986 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)
Estate of Beatty v. Western College of Toledo
177 Ill. 280 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ala. 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conn-v-thornton-ala-1871.