Conn v. Seawind Enterprises, Inc.

406 So. 2d 104
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 1981
Docket81-365
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 406 So. 2d 104 (Conn v. Seawind Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn v. Seawind Enterprises, Inc., 406 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

406 So.2d 104 (1981)

Harry CONN, a/k/a Bruce Harris, Appellant,
v.
SEAWIND ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee.

No. 81-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 24, 1981.

Thomas H. Connors, Miami, for appellant.

Marlow, Shofi, Ortmayer, Smith, Connell & Valerius and Joseph Lowe, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Perceiving no question of fact involving breach of the landlord's duty to exercise reasonable care to an invitee, we affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court.

[T]he mere occurrence of an accident does not give rise to an inference of negligence, and is not sufficient for a finding of negligence on the part of anyone. Robinson v. Allstate Insurance Company, 367 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Marcano v. Puhalovich, 362 So.2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Lash v. Nolan, 321 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); and City Cab of Orlando, Inc. v. Green, 308 So.2d 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

SCHWARTZ, Judge (dissenting).

I do not believe the defendant carried its burden of showing conclusively that the plaintiff's slip and fall was not caused or contributed to by the unreasonably slippery condition of its stairway. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966); 194th Street Hotel Corp. v. Hopf, 383 So.2d 739 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Majeske v. Palm Beach Kennel Club, 117 So.2d 531 (Fla.2d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla. 1960). I would therefore reverse the summary judgment entered below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc.
922 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Zygmont v. Smith
548 So. 2d 902 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Estock v. Krstic
526 So. 2d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Chomar v. Tropicanada Corp.
419 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 So. 2d 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conn-v-seawind-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1981.