Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Conn v. Jones

Conn v. Jones

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Conn v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 Ohio St. 186 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1926·No. No. 19329·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, J.

Under Section 12075, G. C., a property owner may apply for an iirjunction to restrain the [395]*395levy or collection of a tax upon the ground that the property to be taxed is exempt from taxation, without proceeding under Sections 5616 et seq., General Code. In such case these sections provide a concurrent and not an exclusive remedy. Bashore v. Brown, 108 Ohio St., 18; Cuyahoga Falls v. Beck, 110 Ohio St., 82; Hammond v. Winders, 112 Ohio St., 158, distinguished.

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J. Day, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur. Jones, J. dissenting. Matthias, J, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conn v. Jones, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 394 (Ohio 1926).

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 394 (Conn v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. Winder
147 N.E. 94 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1925)
City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Beck
143 N.E. 661 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)