Conn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided December 16, 2021·No. 6:19-cv-00552·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JEFFRY A. CONN, Case No. 6:19-cv-00552-HZ

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY vs. FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Payment of this award shall be via check made payable to Plaintiff’s attorneys and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010), the award shall be made payable to Katherine Eitenmiller, HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the federal treasury offset program. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein. Dated this __1_6__ day of ___D_e_c_______ 2021.

_______________________________________ MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge Proposed Order submitted by: Katherine L. Eitenmiller HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 686-1969

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2021).

Conn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Conn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)