Conlon v. Michigan Brewing Co.

Sixth Circuit

Conlon v. Michigan Brewing Co.

101 F.2d 1007, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4501

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 11, 1939

DocketNo. 8070

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 101 F.2d 1007 (Conlon v. Michigan Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conlon v. Michigan Brewing Co., 101 F.2d 1007, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4501 (6th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It does not appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion in denying the modification of the injunction entered on March 16, 1938, so as to permit appellant to proceed against appellee, Michigan Brewing Company, debtor, in the case pending in the Circuit Court for the County of Kent, Michigan, entitled “Walter J. Conlon vs. Michigan Brewing Company, et al, No. 36946”.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order, 24 F.Supp. 430, appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It does not appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion in denying the modification of the injunction entered on March 16, 1938, so as to permit appellant to proceed against appellee, Michigan Brewing Company, debtor, in the case pending in the Circuit Court for the County of Kent, Michigan, entitled “Walter J. Conlon vs. Michigan Brewing Company, et al, No. 36946”.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order, 24 F.Supp. 430, appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 F.2d 1007, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conlon-v-michigan-brewing-co-ca6-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack