Conlon v. K-Mart Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Conlon v. K-Mart Corp.

127 F. App'x 681

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2388

StatusPublished

This text of 127 F. App'x 681 (Conlon v. K-Mart Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conlon v. K-Mart Corp., 127 F. App'x 681 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Kevin Conlon appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Conlon v. K-Mart Corp., No. CA-01-958-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 28, 2004 & entered Sept. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Kevin Conlon appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Conlon v. K-Mart Corp., No. CA-01-958-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 28, 2004 & entered Sept. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conlon-v-k-mart-corp-ca4-2005.