Conlon v. Independent School District No. 38

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Conlon v. Independent School District No. 38

202 N.W. 73, 162 Minn. 511, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1543

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 13, 1925

DocketNo. 24,520.

StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.W. 73 (Conlon v. Independent School District No. 38) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conlon v. Independent School District No. 38, 202 N.W. 73, 162 Minn. 511, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1543 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the school election held in Independent School District No. 38 of Scott County in July, 1924, two trustees were to be elected. The contestants filed as candidates for these positions. Their names and ho others were upon the ballots furnished by the clerk for use at the election. The names of the contestees were upon ballots printed and furnished by parties other than the clerk. The contestees received a majority of the votes cast at the election and were declared elected. The contestants contend that the use of ballots not prepared by the clerk was unauthorized and the votes cast therewith illegal. The questions presented are considered and determined in the case of Grimsrud v. Johnson supra, page 98. On the authority of that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At the school election held in Independent School District No. 38 of Scott County in July, 1924, two trustees were to be elected. The contestants filed as candidates for these positions. Their names and ho others were upon the ballots furnished by the clerk for use at the election. The names of the contestees were upon ballots printed and furnished by parties other than the clerk. The contestees received a majority of the votes cast at the election and were declared elected. The contestants contend that the use of ballots not prepared by the clerk was unauthorized and the votes cast therewith illegal. The questions presented are considered and determined in the case of Grimsrud v. Johnson supra, page 98. On the authority of that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.W. 73, 162 Minn. 511, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conlon-v-independent-school-district-no-38-minn-1925.